Shock. Terror. Horror.

Are some of the words I’ve heard most often in the past day. You probably know why, too. Just like you also immediately knew who were the perpetrators of the terror in question. Ah, wait. But how could you not know?!?! They were shouting “Allah is great!” Sometimes it’s really fucked to stay politically correct, despite one’s best efforts. For instance, we could spent a few hours screwing around with the formulation “we still do not know who the perpetrators of this heinous act are” or “the police do not reject the possibility of a terrorist attack” and shit like that, even though we all know to a tee who the perpetrator is. Can those who suspected radical Jainists please raise their hands. Anyone?

When a mentally “disturbed” young man rammed a van into the crowd at the Christmas markets in Nantes the other day I, for one, knew immediately who he was. Before the police. I was shouting at the televion, “Listen, ya want me to tell you?! Fucking idiots!”

But soon it turned out that although the young man in question was indeed Muslim, he had psychological problems. So it’s ok. It wasn’t done because he was radical, just a bit whacked. In general, we know from experience that people with psychological problems have a tendency to occasionally ram their vans into market crowds. Also, if I understood right, there’s a clear line of demarcation somewhere between a psychological problem and the belief in 72 virgins in paradise.

10906159_10205892619577289_3835950279171760544_nI wasn’t surprised at all yesterday by the events in Paris. I wish I was, but I wasn’t. Moreover, I have been expecting them these days. And I expect more of them in coming days, too. If I had been shocked that would have meant that I had somehow managed to spend the last ten years with my brain completely isolated in a box that blocks out the reality of the visible world. Or with my head in the sand. And that would be truly be a feat because Muslims, fundamentalists, not to be politically insensitive, don’t stop repeating their intentions. Repeating may be the wrong word. They demonstrate them. Including yesterday (necessarily emphasized because the number is spinning like the water meter of a decent-sized five story building, I mean, it’s already higher today than it was yesterday … never mind today, from the moment you started reading this!), since September 11, 2001, 24,795 Islamic terrorist attacks have been carried out in the world, and that’s just counting the ones where there were casualties. How the systematic slaughter and extermination of everything non-Muslim in the current caliphate is calculated, I haven’t the slightest. Maybe it isn’t even calculated but subsumed under local culture and customs. Since I’m very often criticized for being a kultur fascist because not only do I not understand them but I vocally oppose Islamic customs. If I understand right, and you can correct me, things that are not desirable for your daughters, say, sexual slavery, are completely acceptable for the women of Jazid in the caliphate and subsumed under multicultural diversity.

My only shock is your shock. Seriously, can you tell me the secret of your complete coma. By the by, hypothetically, for the purpose of argument, can you tell me what would happen if you could actually add 2 + 2? Because obviously beheadings, mass executions, extermination, 24,795 attacks, rapes, forced pedophile marriages, hangings, floggings, stonings, Nazi-style greetings – not to go on and on until the next dawn – god knows don’t seem to leave much of an impression on you. So I’m curious, what would impress you deeply enough to get you to contemplate the obvious in a moment of realization?

The only thing that shocks me more than your shock is your stupidity. Frankly, I don’t feel like searching out a more tactful formulation. Nor is there any need nor does it makes sense, and on top of all that we are starting to run out of time. You are simply stupid, at the level of someone with a diploma in political science from some Swedish university. Because for you still “all religions are the same and equally intolerant.” Equally? Really? And again, somehow, I have no dilemma as to which intolerance you would choose if you were forced to choose? That is, I know which one you wouldn’t choose. If you are a woman, I don’t have a hundredth of a second of hesitation and, faced with the terror of a choice, neither would you. If you’re gay, likewise. An atheist. A secularist. A Jew. If your IQ is higher than 16 and if, in the last few years, while flipping channels with your remote, you chanced upon the world news even once. When the analysts are explaining, after a video where murderers shout “Allah is great” while shooting a police officer in the head, in broad daylight, in the middle of Paris, that this “has nothing to do with Islam” and it doesn’t sound really strange to you, it’s ok , your anesthesia is still working.

385745_458309767529463_859033883_nIn addition to being stupid, you are also responsible for yesterday’s massacre of freedom in Paris. Because it happened because someone allowed it to happen, and it’s you who think that freedom of expression has a limit, that freedom in general has a limit, and a price by god, and that we can continue haggling over it, and you who rushed to proclaim me and others like me “equally aggressive and militant as those I criticize”. What am I doing, anyway, with a pen in my hand and not a Kalashnikov. And it’s completely ironic that you spent the day yesterday uploading photos of broken pencils on your profiles on the social networks. I know it’s hard to get this through to you because your heads are buried in the sand or stuck up your own asses, but your guilt is greater than the guilt of the perpetrators themselves.

The message of yesterday’s murders (in broad daylight, in Paris, which somehow is not the same as in broad daylight in Islamabad, say, or Damascus, because there is a local custom and you never know when you can use the rebels against the regime, the regime against the rebels, the Shiites against the Sunnis and Sunnis against the Shiites and who knows who else against who else and for what … barrels of oil, geting closer to the Caspian region, seceeding from something, weapons sales, XYZ of wonders and combinations) is political and symbolic. It was a massacre of the FOUNDATION of our civilization, or simply civilization – freedom of speech. And that is a Western traditions and with it began every possible emancipation in the world. And that is the greatest achievement of mankind throughout its history – laughing at authorities and critical reflection on religion.

Ironically-symbolically, it began nowhere but in France. The Enlightenment, Voltaire, Diderot, Montesquieu … do those names mean anything to you? “People will never truly be free until the last king is hung on the intestines of the last priest” (Diderot). That, you see, is the foundation of our freedom.

“What is happening is the suicide of the West, the lights are extinguished,” said Houellebecq, whom they have tried in the past for Islamophobia and whose new novel, Submission, – mark the symbolism again – was published yesterday in France, the theme being the Muslim takeover of the government of France. According to the folk adage that one man’s twilight is another man’s dawn, the book will sell three million copies. It may seem like serious science fiction to you but it isn’t … One doesn’t even have to have any vision. All day today I’ve been resisting the urge to get on the networks and say “I told you so” … I hate being right. But write down today’s date somwhere and listen to what I’m going to say – yesterday’s terror in Paris will be repeated. How do I know? The same way I knew what happened yesterday was going to happen. They are constantly announcing it.

The streets of French cities were full yesterday, and it was both beautiful and touching. On all sides messages and signs reading “WE ARE NOT AFRAID”. A lie. Everyone is afraid. Terror is effective.

Out of fear we have transparent garbage bags on the streets. Out of fear the PA system in the metro announces at regular intervals that every suspicious package and suitcase without an owner will be immediately destroyed. In two, sometimes even three languages. Out of fear we avoid certain quarters of European cities after dusk. Some, god knows, we avoid even during the day. And god knows the police avoids them, too. Out of fear we avoid the gaze of Salafists and Wahhabis in the street because their appearance screams the message “I hate you”. Out of fear you send me private messages in my inbox saying you concerned about me. Out of fear you you send me private messages of support while I receive openly threatening messages in the comments below my texts. Finally, out of fear we remain silent before our colleagues and our neighbors, because you never know where and when some Islamo-leftist will decide to push the envelope. It’s true that the right is picking up strength and gleaning profit. And in the next elections Marine Le Pen will slide into the second round without a hitch. But that’s not her fault. It’s also out of fear.

And all those nice Muslims, because you always have only nice Muslims among your friends, which is to say, following your unfuckable logic, Islam is nice … They’re the ones who really live in fear. In the blink of an eye anyone can be swallowed by an open manhole in any Muslim neighborhood of any major European city. And the first victims of Islam are Muslims. Just look at the abject misery of the Islamic world. If you can, at least for a moment, even when forced to do so by events like these, pull your head out of your own ass.

10801548_367997423368739_2954595621205117808_nAleksandar Lambros, outspoken atheist, journalist, photographer, the author of the atheist manifesto GOD NEVER LAUGHS

Oh, They Are Just Moderate Muslims You Say?

downloadHow often have you heard politicians say that the majority of Muslims in the West are hard-working, law-abiding moderates? How often have you heard them say that moderate Muslims are the answer to the problem of Islamic extremism?

These platitudes are supposed to reassure us. Here are ten reasons why they don’t.

1. Moderate Muslims have a worrying capacity to produce terrorist offspring.

Hook-handed hate preacher Abu Hamza’s father was an Egyptian army officer – middle class and thoroughly respectable.

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the notorious ‘underpants bomber’, comes from a wealthy Nigerian family. His father, Umaru Mutallab is (according to The Guardian) “one of the country’s most respected businessmen”.

Omar Hammami left his home in Alabama, USA, to become a leader of the Islamist terror organisation al Shabaab. His father, a retired civil engineer, said, “I tried my best, and so did my wife, to raise him the best we could.”

Hasib Hussain’s quiet, hard-working parents were “devastated” to learn that their son was the bus bomber who killed 13 people in London on 7th July 2005.

2. Muslim moderates are terrified of Muslim extremists

The implicit, ever-present threat of ostracism or violence keeps quiet Muslims in line – which means that the radicals usually get their way. As John Hawkins notes: “Imagine how … terrifying it must be to condemn Jihadists when you may semi-regularly run into people who think that way in your neighborhood or mosque.”

3. Moderates can turn into extremists

Even Muslims who appear at ease in western society can flip.

In the 1980’s Andy Choudary was a party animal who lived for sex and booze. He turned into Anjem Choudary, rabble-rousing hate preacher and co-founder of poppy-burning Islamist group al Muhajiroun.

As a teenager in Leeds, Mohammad Sidique Khan was to all appearances fully westernised, even to the extent of calling himself ‘Sid’. In July 2005, 30-year-old Sid took a rucksack full of explosives to London and detonated it on a Tube train, killing 7 innocent people.

Sid’s fellow 7/7 terrorist Shehzad Tanweer was described by neighbours as a “nice lad” who could “get on with anyone”. He murdered 7 others.

4. Moderate Muslims slaughter conscious animals

There are some practices in the Islamic world acceptable to Muslim moderates but abhorrent to most westerners. These practices include ritual halal slaughter (regarded as wholesome family entertainment in some Muslim communities).

Moderate Muslims buy halal food. They also pay zakat. There’s evidence that income from sales of halal and zakat have both been used to fund terrorism.

Think twice before ordering that kebab – you could be funding terrorism

5. Moderates aren’t all that moderate

Still on the subject of animals, here’s a quote from respected UK journalist Mehdi Hasan:
“The kuffar, the disbelievers, the atheists who remain deaf and stubborn to the teachings of Islam, the rational message of the Koran; they are described in the Koran as ‘a people of no intelligence’, Allah describes them as not of no morality, not as people of no belief – people of ‘no intelligence’ – because they’re incapable of the intellectual effort it requires to shake off those blind prejudices, to shake off those easy assumptions about this world, about the existence of God. In this respect, the Koran describes the atheists as ‘cattle’, as cattle of those who grow the crops and do not stop and wonder about this world.”

Inayet Bunglawala is media secretary for the Muslim Council of Britain, appointee to a government anti-extremism taskforce and, like Mehdi Hasan, a darling of the liberal media. In 1993 he described Omar Abdel-Rahman, mastermind of that year’s World Trade Center bombing as “courageous”. He has also called Osama bin Laden a “freedom fighter”.

Such attitudes are by no means rare amongst ‘moderate’ Muslims. In a 2007 Pew Research study of Muslim nations around the world, 38% responded that suicide bombings and other violence against civilians are sometimes justified. And a Daily Telegraph survey found that 6% of British Muslims supported the London 7/7 bombings. (Source: Wikipedia.)

London 7/7 bombings – supported by 100,000 UK Muslims

6. There’s no way of knowing if a Muslim really is moderate

Islamic fanatics are well-versed in the arts of taqiyya and kitman – lying and deceiving in the cause of Islam –, as practised by the Prophet himself. It is part of any extremist’s modus operandi to convince enemy dupes that he’s harmless.

7. When is a fanatic not a fanatic? When he’s on the government payroll

The Quilliam Foundation is an anti-extremism organisation which proposes such remedies as rehab centres for would-be bombers and recovering Islamists. Quilliam’s founders know all about Islamism: Maajid Nawaz is a convicted former recruiting officer for Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Islamist organisation that wants to end democracy, establish a global caliphate and destroy the state of Israel.

Mr Nawaz is a reformed character now, which of course has nothing to do with his reported £85,000 a year salary as Quilliam’s Executive Director. Nice work if you can get it.

Many have argued that the government’s Prevent strategy (also intended to combat radicalism) is little more than a publicly funded extortion racket. In 2011 Home Secretary Theresa May admitted that some of the £63million annual anti-extremism budget had been handed over to extremist organisations.

“Give me the money and I’ll behave – at least for now”, seems to be the unspoken threat of every ‘reformed’ extremist or terrorist sympathiser seeking a lucrative alternative to the dole.

8. Many moderates support sharia law

Sharia, as you may know, is a primitive system of injustice that operates in many Islamic countries and discriminates against women, homosexuals and non-Muslims. If ever imposed here, sharia law would condemn your (Christian, Jewish, Sikh, etc.) grandchildren to permanent second-class status and make their lives very unpleasant, to say the least.

A poll in 2006 found that 40% of UK Muslims want Sharia in Britain. A 2010 survey of British Muslim students echoed that result (and almost one-third of them thought that killing in the name of Islam was justified).

Many UK Muslims want sharia

9. Islam has a different understanding of ‘moderacy’ than we do

Many Muslims would regard stoning a woman for adultery or a flogging gay men as moderate, even compassionate actions. Which in a way they are, when you consider the punishments favoured in some parts of the Islamic world.

10. Even moderate Muslims like to proselytise

More moderate Muslims equals more mosques equals more Islamisation equals more Islamic enclaves equals fewer places in Britain where non-Muslims can feel at home.

The growth of proselytising Islam in Britain also means more conversions of non-Muslims to Islam, people like Samantha Lewthwaite, terrorist plotter Richard Dart and Lee Rigby’s murderer Michael Adebolajo.

modetare muslims in Norway:

Psychology: Why Islam creates monsters

by Nicolai Sennels

nicolai-sennelsPsychopathic people and behaviour are found within all cultures and religions. But one tops them all — by many lengths. The daily mass killings, terror, persecutions and family executions committed by the followers of Islam are nauseating, and the ingenuity behind the attacks — always looking for new and more effective ways of killing and terrorising people — is astonishing: hijacking jumbo jets and flying them into skyscrapers, hunting unarmed and innocent people with grenades and automatic rifles in shopping malls, planting bombs in one’s own body, using model airplanes as drones, attaching large rotating blades to pickup trucks and using them as human lawn movers, killing family members with acid or fire, hanging people publicly from cranes in front of cheering crowds, etc. It makes one ask oneself: what creates such lack of empathy and almost playful and creative attitude towards murdering perceived enemies?

This is a question for psychologists like me.

Studying the Muslim mind

1013786_310779905728329_1019055254_nNobody is born a mass murderer, a rapist or a violent criminal. So what is it in the Muslim culture that influence their children in a way that make so relatively many Muslims harm other people?

As a psychologist in a Danish youth prison, I had a unique chance to study the mentality of Muslims. 70 percent of youth offenders in Denmark have a Muslim background. I was able to compare them with non-Muslim clients from the same age group with more or less the same social background. I came to the conclusion that Islam and Muslim culture have certain psychological mechanisms that harm people’s development and increase criminal behaviour.

I am, of course, aware that Muslims are different, and not all Muslims follow the Quran’s violent and perverted message and their prophet’s equally embarrassing example. But as with all other religions, Islam also influences its followers and the culture they live in.

One could talk about two groups of psychological mechanisms, that both singly and combined increase violent behaviour. One group is mainly connected with religion, which aims at indoctrinating Islamic values in children as early as possible and with whatever means necessary, including violence and intimidation. One can understand a Muslim parent’s concern about his offspring’s religious choices, because the sharia orders the death penalty for their children, should they pick another religion than their parents. The other group of mechanisms are more cultural and psychological. These cultural psychological mechanisms are a natural consequence of being influenced by a religion like Islam and stemming from a 1,400 year old tribal society with very limited freedom to develop beyond what the religion allows.

Classical brainwashing methods in the upbringing

291421_20121123reutersadnan-abidiamrohadi004284754_orighBrainwashing people into believing or doing things against their own human nature — such as hating or even killing innocents they do not even know — is traditionally done by combining two things: pain and repetition. The conscious infliction of psychological and physical suffering breaks down the person’s resistance to the constantly repeated message.

Totalitarian regimes use this method to reform political dissidents. Armies in less civilized countries use it to create ruthless soldiers, and religious sects all over the world use it to fanaticize their followers.

During numerous sessions with more than a hundred Muslim clients, I found that violence and repetition of religious messages are prevalent in Muslim families.

Muslim culture simply does not have the same degree of understanding of human development as in civilized societies, and physical pain and threats are therefore often the preferred tool to raise children. This is why so many Muslim girls grow up to accept violence in their marriage, and why Muslim boys grow up to learn that violence is acceptable. And it is the main reason why nine out of ten children removed from their parents by authorities in Copenhagen are from immigrant families. The Muslim tradition of using pain and intimidation as part of disciplining children are also widely used in Muslim schools — also in the West.

291424_20121124reutersthaier-alsudanibaghdaddi004288081_orighCombined with countless repetitions of Quranic verses in Islamic schools and families, all this makes it very difficult for children to defend themselves against being indoctrinated to follow the Quran, even if it is against secular laws, logic, and the most basic understanding of compassion.

And as we know from so many psychological studies, whatever a child is strongly influenced by at that age takes an enormous personal effort to change later in life. It is no wonder that Muslims in general, in spite of Islam’s inhumane nature and obvious inability to equip its followers with humor, compassion and other attractive qualities, are stronger in their faith than any other religious group.

Four enabling psychological factors

Not only does a traditional Islamic upbringing resemble classical brainwashing methods, but also, the culture it generates cultivates four psychological characteristics that further enable and increase violent behaviour.

These four mental factors are anger, self-confidence, responsibility for oneself and intolerance.

When it comes to anger, Western societies widely agree that it is a sign of weakness. Uncontrolled explosions of this unpleasant feeling are maybe the fastest way of losing face, especially in Northern countries, and though angry people may be feared, they are never respected. In Muslim culture, anger is much more accepted, and being able to intimidate people is seen as strength and source of social status. We even see ethnic Muslim groups or countries proudly declare whole days of anger, and use expressions such as “holy anger” — a term that seems contradictory in peaceful cultures.

In Western societies, the ability to handle criticism constructively if it is justified, and with a shrug if it is misguided, is seen as an expression of self-confidence and authenticity. As everyone has noticed, this is not the case among Muslims. Here criticism, no matter how true, is seen as an attack on one’s honor, and it is expected that the honor is restored by using whatever means necessary to silence the opponent. Muslims almost never attempt to counter criticism with logical arguments; instead, they try to silence the criticism by pretending to be offended or by name-calling, or by threatening or even killing the messenger.

150663_440341369370360_571793557_nThe third psychological factor concerns responsibility for oneself, and here the psychological phenomenon “locus of control” plays a major role. People raised by Western standards generally have an inner locus of control, meaning that they experience their lives as governed by inner factors, such as one’s own choices, world view, ways of handling emotions and situations, etc. Muslims are raised to experience their lives as being controlled from the outside. Everything happens “insha’ Allah” — if Allah wills — and the many religious laws, traditions and powerful male authorities leave little room for individual responsibility. This is the cause for the embarrassing and world-famous Muslim victim mentality, where everybody else is blamed and to be punished for the Muslims’ own self-created situation.

Finally, the fourth psychological factor making Muslims vulnerable to the violent message in the Quran concerns tolerance. While Western societies in general define a good person as being open and tolerant, Muslims are told that they are superior to non-Muslims, destined to dominate non-Muslims, and that they must distance themselves socially and emotionally from non-Muslims. The many hateful and dehumanising verses in the Quran and the Hadiths against non-Muslims closely resemble the psychological propaganda that leaders use against their own people in order to prepare them mentally for fighting and killing the enemy. Killing another person is easier if you hate him and do not perceive him as fully human.

Why Islam creates monsters

The cultural and psychological cocktail of anger, low self-esteem, victim mentality, a willingness to be blindly guided by outer authorities, and an aggressive and discriminatory view toward non-Muslims, forced upon Muslims through pain, intimidation and mind-numbing repetitions of the Quran’s almost countless verses promoting hate and violence against non-Muslims, is the reason why Islam creates monsters.

The psychological problem within Islam

Indian_Kashmiri_Muslim_Shakeel_Bhat_British_Srinagar_200707042158136710_afpThe problem with Islam and Muslim culture is that there are so many psychological factors pushing its followers towards a violent attitude against non-Muslims that a general violent clash is — at least from a psychological perspective — inevitable. With such strong pressure and such strong emotions within such a large group of people — all pitched against us — we are facing the perfect storm, and I see no possibilities of turning it around. For people to change, they have to want it, to be allowed to change, and to be able to change — and only a tiny minority of Muslims have such lucky conditions.

Far too many people underestimate the power of psychology embedded in religion and culture. As we have already seen, no army of social workers, generous welfare states, sweet-talking politicians, politically correct journalists or democracy-promoting soldiers can stop these enormous forces. Sensible laws on immigration and Islamisation in our own countries can limit the amount of suffering, but based on my education and professional experience as a psychologist for Muslims, I estimate that we will not be able to deflect or avoid this many-sided, aggressive movement against our culture.

319772_477600002267106_2040605746_nI do believe that we, as a democratic and educated society can become focused and organised concerning the preservation of our values and constitutions, can win this ongoing conflict started by the often inbred followers of sharia. The big question is how much of our dignity, our civil rights, and our blood, money and tears will we lose in the process.